ARVR vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ARVR tracks the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARVR returned 35.02% vs 25.72% for CRTC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

ARVR vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 9.78% return.

ARVR

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 11.38%
• YTD: 18.88%
• 6M: 17.88%
• 1Y: 35.02%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARVR vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	18.88%	29.07%	10.11%	7.99%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	9.78%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and CRTC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.79

The correlation between ARVR and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARVR vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARVR	CRTC
Technology	43.8%	33.5%
Communication Services	10.4%	16.0%
Healthcare	2.1%	14.1%
Industrials	1.1%	14.1%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	7.1%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

ARVR vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARVR

ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 47
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARVR vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARVR	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.03	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.76	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.92	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	10.94	-4.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARVR vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARVR	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.03	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.40	-0.61

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARVR	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.25%	-19.07%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.73%	-9.05%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.19%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-2.13%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.83%	2.41%	+3.42%

Volatility

ARVR vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 2.91%. This indicates that ARVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARVR	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	2.91%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	9.62%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	12.72%	+6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	15.73%	+7.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.44%	15.73%	+7.71%

ARVR vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARVR vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CRTC's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.81%	0.11%	0.27%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.98%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARVR and CRTC in my portfolio?

ARVR and CRTC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARVR or CRTC?

ARVR has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to CRTC (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.25% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, ARVR or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, ARVR leads with 35.02% vs 25.72% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARVR or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, ARVR has performed better with a 35.02% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARVR or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARVR or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.45% for ARVR.

What is the main difference between ARVR and CRTC?

ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.