ARVR vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARVR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. ARVR is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, ARVR returned 23.99% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

ARVR vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

ARVR

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 23.99%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARVR vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	13.47%	29.07%	10.11%	22.13%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and BAMU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	-0.04

The correlation between ARVR and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ARVR vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARVR

ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 31
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARVR vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARVR	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	4.94	-3.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	8.71	-7.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	2.41	-1.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	24.37	-23.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	96.52	-92.47

ARVR vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.40%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARVR	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.40%	-0.36%	-26.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.73%	-0.12%	-17.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	0.00%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-0.02%	-5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	0.03%	+5.90%

Volatility

ARVR vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ARVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARVR	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.82%	0.09%	+10.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.60%	0.39%	+17.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.41%	0.58%	+20.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	0.87%	+22.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	0.87%	+22.91%

ARVR vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARVR vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.81%	0.11%	0.27%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARVR and BAMU in my portfolio?

ARVR and BAMU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARVR or BAMU?

ARVR has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.40% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, ARVR or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, ARVR leads with 23.99% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, ARVR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARVR or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, ARVR has performed better with a 23.99% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARVR or BAMU?

ARVR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARVR or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.47% for ARVR.

What is the main difference between ARVR and BAMU?

ARVR is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.