ARSVX vs. YFSIX
ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both mutual funds - ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while YFSIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 5 years, ARSVX returned 5.61%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 20.64% return.
ARSVX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- -2.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 17.17%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 8.37% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 13.00% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 20.64% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARSVX and YFSIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARSVX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARSVX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
ARSVX
YFSIX
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARSVX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.19 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 3.55 | -3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARSVX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.85% | -35.10% | -19.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.62% | -14.20% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -14.20% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.21% | -25.14% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -5.93% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -4.89% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 4.73% | +3.77% |
Volatility
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) is 3.39%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that ARSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARSVX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 6.55% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 15.68% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 22.41% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 15.70% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 16.34% | +2.95% |
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARSVX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARSVX nor YFSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARSVX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSIX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to ARSVX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARSVX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer