ARSVX vs. YACKX
ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) and YACKX (AMG Yacktman Fund) are both mutual funds - ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while YACKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX returned 9.53%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for YACKX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for YACKX.
Performance
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.01% annualized return.
ARSVX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- -2.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 8.37% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 11.73% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 15.31% | 19.64% | 4.83% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 17.71% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARSVX and YACKX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARSVX and YACKX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARSVX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
ARSVX
YACKX
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARSVX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.04 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 11.83 | -12.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than YACKX's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and YACKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARSVX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.85% | -46.65% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.62% | -6.86% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -13.66% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.21% | -19.86% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | -30.93% | -9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -4.32% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -5.10% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 2.33% | +6.17% |
Volatility
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) is 3.39%, while AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that ARSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARSVX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.89% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 9.89% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 11.71% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 12.95% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 13.78% | +5.51% |
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARSVX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YACKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 15.40% | 17.75% | 9.70% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 9.31% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARSVX and YACKX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YACKX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to ARSVX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs YACKX's -46.65%.
YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARSVX and YACKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer