PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARSVX vs. GWGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than GWGIX's 16.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX has underperformed GWGIX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while GWGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.


ARSVX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.88%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
8.23%

GWGIX

1D
1.21%
1M
-0.97%
6M
11.39%
YTD
16.88%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.82%
ALL TIME*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
9.41%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%
GWGIX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund
16.88%1.53%10.85%14.76%-18.09%26.01%23.31%31.02%-8.14%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ARSVX and GWGIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between ARSVX and GWGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARSVX vs. GWGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GWGIX
GWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARSVXGWGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.20

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

1.97

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

6.48

-6.48

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARSVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the GWGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARSVX and GWGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than GWGIX's maximum drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and GWGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARSVXGWGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.85%

-37.41%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.62%

-9.90%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-25.85%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-27.18%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

-37.41%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.76%

-3.02%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-6.89%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

2.99%

+5.53%

Volatility

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARSVXGWGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

13.21%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

17.86%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

19.95%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

20.19%

-0.88%

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GWGIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARSVX vs. GWGIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARSVX nor GWGIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%
GWGIX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.95%0.19%4.22%5.45%0.12%0.37%2.48%1.46%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARSVX and GWGIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARSVX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to GWGIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs GWGIX's -37.41%.

GWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARSVX and GWGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer