ARSVX vs. FISVX
ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) and FISVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ARSVX returned 2.83%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for FISVX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FISVX.
Performance
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FISVX's 17.41% return.
ARSVX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- 1Y
- -5.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
FISVX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 42.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- —
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | -1.26% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 15.21% |
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund | 17.41% | 12.70% | 8.16% | 14.72% | -14.42% | 28.26% | 4.49% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARSVX and FISVX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ARSVX and FISVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARSVX vs. FISVX — Risk / Return Rank
ARSVX
FISVX
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARSVX | FISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.39 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 4.87 | -5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 16.51 | -17.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARSVX | FISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 2.32 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.31 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than FISVX's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and FISVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARSVX | FISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.85% | -44.66% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.62% | -8.54% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -26.50% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.21% | -26.50% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.05% | -1.49% | -12.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -10.34% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.12% | 2.51% | +5.61% |
Volatility
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) is 3.20%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ARSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARSVX | FISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 5.00% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 12.03% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 18.00% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 21.71% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 26.74% | -7.39% |
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARSVX vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison
ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FISVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund | 1.86% | 2.18% | 1.70% | 2.06% | 3.69% | 9.55% | 1.33% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARSVX and FISVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISVX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ARSVX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs FISVX's -44.66%.
FISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARSVX and FISVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer