PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARSVX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ARSMX's -0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX has underperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.25% annualized return.


ARSVX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-1.26%
6M
-10.55%
1Y
-5.66%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
8.78%

ARSMX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-5.59%
1Y
0.64%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
-1.26%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.73%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ARSVX and ARSMX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.98

The correlation between ARSVX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARSVX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARSVXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.01

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.02

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

0.05

-0.80

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARSVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARSVX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARSVXARSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

0.02

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.20

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.04

Drawdowns

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARSVXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.85%

-51.75%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.62%

-10.37%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-19.34%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-19.34%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

-42.96%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.05%

-8.18%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-8.11%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

4.37%

+3.75%

Volatility

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.68%. This indicates that ARSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARSVXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.68%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

10.16%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

14.36%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.78%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

19.57%

-0.22%

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARSVX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARSVX nor ARSMX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ARSVX and ARSMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARSVX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to ARSMX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

ARSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARSVX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer