PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARSTX vs. JQC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARSTX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund (ARSTX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARSTX achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSTX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 11.99%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


ARSTX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.52%
6M
8.79%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.99%

JQC

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.62%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARSTX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARSTX
Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund
10.52%7.78%16.94%17.69%-19.84%35.98%18.68%29.05%-11.48%10.13%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
0.73%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ARSTX and JQC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2003

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between ARSTX and JQC has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARSTX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARSTX
ARSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ARSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARSTX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund (ARSTX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARSTXJQCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

0.23

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

0.46

+10.06

ARSTX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARSTX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARSTXJQCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.21

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.36

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.33

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.23

+0.25

Drawdowns

ARSTX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARSTX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSTX and JQC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARSTXJQCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.51%

-75.18%

+18.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-10.15%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.97%

-15.37%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.97%

-19.83%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.11%

-47.99%

+4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-5.34%

+4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-8.82%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

5.04%

-2.17%

Volatility

ARSTX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund (ARSTX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 2.16%. This indicates that ARSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARSTXJQCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

2.16%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

8.80%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

11.11%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

13.17%

+9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

17.56%

+5.66%

ARSTX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARSTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARSTX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

ARSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than JQC's 13.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSTX
Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund
2.29%2.53%2.42%0.00%0.40%21.05%1.25%0.37%21.67%10.31%8.92%20.02%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.22%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARSTX and JQC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARSTX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to JQC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSTX dropped -56.51% vs JQC's -75.18%.

ARSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARSTX and JQC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer