ARSMX vs. FCPVX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX).
ARSMX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007. FCPVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Performance
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | -3.04% | -0.83% | 12.42% | 14.48% | -8.62% | 23.41% | 1.71% | 34.82% | -6.44% | 15.26% |
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | -0.85% | 8.13% | 9.41% | 17.77% | -13.07% | 38.08% | 11.18% | 20.86% | -15.47% | 12.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARSMX achieves a -3.04% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's -0.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARSMX having a 9.33% annualized return and FCPVX not far ahead at 9.45%.
ARSMX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -3.04%
- 6M
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- -0.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
FCPVX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARSMX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ARSMX vs. FCPVX — Risk / Return Rank
ARSMX
FCPVX
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARSMX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 0.63 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 1.03 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.81 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 3.04 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARSMX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 0.63 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.30 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARSMX and FCPVX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison
ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 3.89% | 4.85% | 5.86% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 8.60% | 15.66% | 8.03% | 17.82% |
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 10.24% | 10.15% | 6.13% | 5.20% | 5.92% | 7.95% | 0.46% | 3.49% | 36.44% | 3.64% | 7.12% | 11.09% |
Drawdowns
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARSMX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSMX and FCPVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARSMX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -57.65% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -14.40% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.34% | -23.81% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.96% | -44.59% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.31% | -10.31% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -8.02% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.85% | +0.19% |
Volatility
ARSMX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that ARSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARSMX | FCPVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 5.56% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 11.84% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 21.81% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 20.83% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 22.26% | -2.67% |