PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARP vs. THRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARP vs. THRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARP achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than THRO's 10.68% return.


ARP

1D
0.13%
1M
1.65%
6M
2.24%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.87%

THRO

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.07%
6M
9.54%
YTD
10.68%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$115.46K$121.20K$189.42K
$22.22M$24.97M$80.10M

ARP vs. THRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARP
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
8.24%18.33%13.79%3.66%-0.82%
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
10.68%15.04%32.03%24.40%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ARP and THRO is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.69

The correlation between ARP and THRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARP vs. THRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARP
THRO

Technology

39.5%
44.2%

Financial Services

11.0%
10.8%

Industrials

9.7%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
8.9%

Communication Services

8.9%
8.7%

Healthcare

6.0%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.7%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.1%

Energy

2.7%
3.5%

Utilities

2.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Technology

ARP
39.5%
THRO
44.2%

Financial Services

ARP
11.0%
THRO
10.8%

Industrials

ARP
9.7%
THRO
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ARP
9.4%
THRO
8.9%

Communication Services

ARP
8.9%
THRO
8.7%

Healthcare

ARP
6.0%
THRO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ARP
5.6%
THRO
5.7%

Basic Materials

ARP
3.8%
THRO
1.1%

Energy

ARP
2.7%
THRO
3.5%

Utilities

ARP
2.1%
THRO
0.1%

Real Estate

ARP
1.3%
THRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARP vs. THRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARP
ARP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

THRO
THRO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARP vs. THRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARPTHRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.68

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

6.85

+0.54

ARP vs. THRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARP Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the THRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARP and THRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARP vs. THRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARP drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum THRO drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARP and THRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARPTHRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-26.54%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-10.87%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-19.07%

+8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-2.41%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-6.54%

+4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.66%

+0.39%

Volatility

ARP vs. THRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) is 3.87%, while iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that ARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARPTHRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.40%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

11.72%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

14.52%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

18.70%

-8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

18.70%

-8.19%

ARP vs. THRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARP has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than THRO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARP vs. THRO - Dividend Comparison

ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than THRO's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ARP
PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
6.04%6.54%5.29%2.67%0.06%
THRO
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF
0.25%0.15%0.73%0.55%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARP and THRO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THRO has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to ARP (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARP dropped -10.13% vs THRO's -26.54%.

On 3-year performance, THRO leads with 20.40% vs 13.08% for ARP. On fees, THRO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ARP has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, THRO has performed better with a 20.40% return vs 13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THRO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.

ARP has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.25% for THRO.

They also come from different issuers: PMV and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for ARP and 0.60% for THRO.

ARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARP and THRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer