PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARP vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARP vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARP achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 22.26% return.


ARP

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.94%
YTD
11.60%
6M
12.32%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.93%
YTD
22.26%
6M
24.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARP vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARP and SFTX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.80

ARP vs. SFTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARP
SFTX

Financial Services

22.7%
16.2%

Industrials

16.9%
12.1%

Technology

14.6%
28.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
5.9%

Healthcare

8.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

7.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.7%

Energy

5.5%
8.0%

Communication Services

4.3%
4.5%

Utilities

3.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.9%

Financial Services

ARP
22.7%
SFTX
16.2%

Industrials

ARP
16.9%
SFTX
12.1%

Technology

ARP
14.6%
SFTX
28.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ARP
8.5%
SFTX
5.9%

Healthcare

ARP
8.1%
SFTX
10.1%

Basic Materials

ARP
7.8%
SFTX
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

ARP
5.5%
SFTX
3.7%

Energy

ARP
5.5%
SFTX
8.0%

Communication Services

ARP
4.3%
SFTX
4.5%

Utilities

ARP
3.4%
SFTX
1.9%

Real Estate

ARP
2.7%
SFTX
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARP vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARP
ARP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SFTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARP vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARPSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

ARP vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARPSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

2.57

-1.21

Drawdowns

ARP vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARP drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum SFTX drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARP and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARPSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-12.75%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.29%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-2.78%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

ARP vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARPSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

21.65%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.06%

21.65%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.06%

21.65%

-11.59%

ARP vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARP has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARP vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than SFTX's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ARP
Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
5.86%6.54%5.29%2.67%0.06%
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARP and SFTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFTX is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFTX is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.

ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

They also come from different issuers: PMV and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for ARP and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARP and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer