ARMW vs. ACII
ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.
Performance
ARMW vs. ACII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 27.37% |
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMW and ACII is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMW vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.96 | -7.55 | +12.51 |
Drawdowns
ARMW vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and ACII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -1.27% | -47.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.27% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.55% | -0.42% | -26.13% |
Volatility
ARMW vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.46% | 7.65% | +80.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.46% | 7.65% | +80.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.46% | 7.65% | +80.81% |
ARMW vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMW vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison
ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMW and ACII have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.79% for ACII.
Find the right allocation for ARMW and ACII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer