PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ARMR.AX is traded in AUD, while XDAX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDAX.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMR.AX achieves a -3.08% return, which is significantly higher than XDAX.L's -6.94% return.


ARMR.AX

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
-3.08%
6M
2.37%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDAX.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-6.94%
6M
-4.44%
1Y
-5.87%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
-3.08%47.73%12.11%
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
-6.94%28.47%8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMR.AX and XDAX.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMR.AX
ARMR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XDAX.L
XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARMR.AXXDAX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.95

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.31

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

-0.79

+1.50

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMR.AX and XDAX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMR.AXXDAX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.35

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.47

+0.97

Drawdowns

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMR.AX drawdown since its inception was -22.10%, smaller than the maximum XDAX.L drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMR.AX and XDAX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMR.AXXDAX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-31.51%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-16.58%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.53%

-9.15%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-6.58%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.75%

6.59%

+2.16%

Volatility

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) at 4.45%. This indicates that ARMR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDAX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMR.AXXDAX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

4.45%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.87%

11.96%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.08%

15.02%

+8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

17.17%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

18.16%

+4.75%

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMR.AX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XDAX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMR.AX vs. XDAX.L - Dividend Comparison

ARMR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while XDAX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
2.38%2.18%
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMR.AX and XDAX.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDAX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDAX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ARMR.AX.

ARMR.AX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XDAX.L is Europe Equities. ARMR.AX tracks VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index, while XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ARMR.AX and 0.09% for XDAX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMR.AX and XDAX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer