ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX
ARMR.AX (Betashares Global Defence ETF) and BBUS.AX (BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMR.AX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index, while BBUS.AX is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARMR.AX returned -3.36% vs 573.53% for BBUS.AX. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. ARMR.AX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BBUS.AX.
Performance
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMR.AX achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS.AX's -18.16% return.
ARMR.AX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- -3.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS.AX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -16.48%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 1Y
- 573.53%
- 3Y*
- 43.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMR.AX Betashares Global Defence ETF | -6.62% | 47.73% | 12.11% |
BBUS.AX BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF | -18.16% | 527.35% | -5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMR.AX and BBUS.AX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ARMR.AX
BBUS.AX
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF (BBUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMR.AX | BBUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -37.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 5.20 | -4.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 15.29 | -15.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 30.52 | -30.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMR.AX drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum BBUS.AX drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMR.AX and BBUS.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMR.AX | BBUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -77.93% | +55.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -33.50% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -70.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.43% | -31.99% | +11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -36.12% | +30.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 17.10% | -6.14% |
Volatility
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Volatility Comparison
Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF (BBUS.AX) at 6.47%. This indicates that ARMR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMR.AX | BBUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 6.47% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.25% | 24.37% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 881.65% | -857.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 404.58% | -381.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 404.58% | -381.04% |
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMR.AX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BBUS.AX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMR.AX vs. BBUS.AX - Dividend Comparison
ARMR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while BBUS.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMR.AX Betashares Global Defence ETF | 2.08% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BBUS.AX BetaShares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMR.AX and BBUS.AX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMR.AX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMR.AX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for BBUS.AX.
ARMR.AX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BBUS.AX is Inverse Equities. ARMR.AX tracks VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index, while BBUS.AX tracks S&P 500 Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ARMR.AX and 1.32% for BBUS.AX.
Find the right allocation for ARMR.AX and BBUS.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer