PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX).

ARMR.AX and A200.AX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARMR.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the VettaFi Global Defence Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2024. A200.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Australia 200 Index. It was launched on May 7, 2018. Both ARMR.AX and A200.AX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF		0.05%47.73%12.11%
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		-1.44%10.31%0.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMR.AX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than A200.AX's -1.44% return.

ARMR.AX

1D
-2.46%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-4.34%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

A200.AX

1D
0.27%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
9.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Global Defence ETF

Betashares Australia 200 ETF

Often compared with ARMR.AX:
ARMR.AX vs. DFNS.LARMR.AX vs. DFENARMR.AX vs. DFEN.DEARMR.AX vs. SMHARMR.AX vs. RHM.DEARMR.AX vs. BOTZARMR.AX vs. VWRD.L
Often compared with A200.AX:
A200.AX vs. IVVA200.AX vs. DHHF.AXA200.AX vs. VOOA200.AX vs. IOOA200.AX vs. BHPA200.AX vs. VTVA200.AX vs. VASGX

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMR.AX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than A200.AX's 0.04% expense ratio.

ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF

Return for Risk

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ARMR.AX
ARMR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ARMR.AXA200.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.92

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.31

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.29

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

3.75

+1.14

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the A200.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMR.AX and A200.AX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ARMR.AXA200.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.92

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.69

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.55

+1.23

Correlation

The correlation between ARMR.AX and A200.AX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Dividend Comparison

ARMR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than A200.AX's 3.24% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ARMR.AX
Betashares Global Defence ETF		2.31%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF		3.24%3.33%3.13%3.75%6.35%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%

Drawdowns

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMR.AX drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum A200.AX drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMR.AX and A200.AX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ARMR.AXA200.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-35.55%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-8.40%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-14.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.86%

-7.14%

-7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-4.21%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

2.88%

+2.73%

Volatility

ARMR.AX vs. A200.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Defence ETF (ARMR.AX) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) at 4.95%. This indicates that ARMR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than A200.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ARMR.AXA200.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

4.95%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

8.74%

+9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

13.08%

+10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

12.52%

+10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

15.31%

+7.46%