PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMGX vs. LMLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMGX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than LMLCX's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMGX has underperformed LMLCX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while LMLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.66% annualized return.


ARMGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
2.22%

LMLCX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.77%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.36%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
1.07%4.20%4.67%5.25%-1.91%0.06%0.80%3.38%0.91%3.09%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
2.13%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMGX and LMLCX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012

0.26

The correlation between ARMGX and LMLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMGX vs. LMLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMGX
ARMGX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ARMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARMGXLMLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.48

1.28

+1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.07

2.44

+8.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.49

8.37

+41.12

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the LMLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMGX and LMLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMGX drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, smaller than the maximum LMLCX drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMGX and LMLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMGXLMLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-23.45%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.33%

-4.22%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.55%

-11.77%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.23%

-11.77%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.09%

-23.45%

+14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-1.94%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

1.23%

-1.16%

Volatility

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) is 0.39%, while Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that ARMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMGXLMLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

1.88%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

4.63%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

6.72%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

7.82%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.62%

7.20%

-5.58%

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LMLCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMGX vs. LMLCX - Dividend Comparison

ARMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than LMLCX's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARMGX
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund
2.87%3.00%2.43%2.23%1.37%0.17%1.45%2.32%1.92%1.37%0.96%0.48%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.18%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMGX and LMLCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMLCX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to ARMGX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMGX dropped -21.79% vs LMLCX's -23.45%.

ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMGX and LMLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer