ARKX vs. XDEF
ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. ARKX is actively managed, while XDEF is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDEF.
Performance
ARKX vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKX
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 62.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEF
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 13.39% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKX and XDEF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKX vs. XDEF — Risk / Return Rank
ARKX
XDEF
ARKX vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKX | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKX | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.64 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
ARKX vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKX and XDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKX | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -99.30% | +55.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | -99.25% | +89.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -70.99% | +51.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.60% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKX vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKX | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.16% | 156.20% | -123.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 156.20% | -128.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 156.20% | -128.65% |
ARKX vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKX vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKX nor XDEF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKX and XDEF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
ARKX and XDEF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKX and 0.35% for XDEF.
Find the right allocation for ARKX and XDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer