ARKW vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. ARKW is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

ARKW vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ARKW

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -2.97%
• 6M: 4.60%
• YTD: -4.64%
• 1Y: -4.74%
• 3Y*: 32.39%
• 5Y*: -0.92%
• 10Y*: 21.34%
• ALL TIME*: 19.87%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	$8.17M	$12.26M	$13.73M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ARKW vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	19.88%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

ARKW vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKW	QQQN
Technology	49.7%	47.3%
Consumer Cyclical	16.8%	13.7%
Communication Services	15.3%	5.5%
Financial Services	14.7%	-
Industrials	3.5%	8.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.4%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	19.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

ARKW vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 9
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 9

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARKW vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKW	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.25	—	—

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKW	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.52%	0.00%	-80.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.57%	0.00%	-23.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	0.00%	-23.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARKW	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.40%	0.00%	+33.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.79%	0.00%	+43.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.84%	0.00%	+37.84%

ARKW vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKW vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ARKW or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKW or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKW or QQQN?

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between ARKW and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.18% for QQQN.