ARKW vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. ARKW is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, ARKW returned 10.34% vs -39.67% for IBIT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

ARKW vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.

ARKW

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: -4.37%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 36.42%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: 22.51%

IBIT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -19.59%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -39.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	-4.37%	38.93%	48.61%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.41%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and IBIT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.67

The correlation between ARKW and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARKW vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 14
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKW	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	-0.92	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	-1.30	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.85	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	-0.78	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.59	-1.37	+1.96

ARKW vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKW	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.52%	-52.11%	-28.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.21%	-52.11%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.35%	-49.45%	+26.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.97%	-16.53%	-7.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.89%	29.64%	-11.75%

Volatility

ARKW vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 10.38%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKW	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.38%	12.07%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.57%	34.45%	-9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	44.10%	-11.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	50.26%	-6.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.73%	50.26%	-12.53%

ARKW vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKW vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.66%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKW and IBIT in my portfolio?

ARKW and IBIT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKW or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to ARKW (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, ARKW or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, ARKW leads with 10.34% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 10.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKW or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 10.34% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKW or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKW or IBIT?

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between ARKW and IBIT?

ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.