ARKW vs. BITQ
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. ARKW is actively managed, while BITQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKW returned -0.92%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for BITQ. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BITQ.
Performance
ARKW vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 18.16% return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -4.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.87%
BITQ
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- 39.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.17M | $12.26M | $13.73M | |
| $2.37M | $2.10M | $2.97M |
ARKW vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.64% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -10.71% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 18.16% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -83.86% | -11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and BITQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ARKW and BITQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKW vs. BITQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
BITQ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ARKW
BITQ
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
BITQ
Communication Services
ARKW
BITQ
-
Financial Services
ARKW
BITQ
Industrials
ARKW
BITQ
-
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Energy
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Healthcare
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Real Estate
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Utilities
ARKW
-
BITQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
BITQ
ARKW vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.11 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 0.55 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 1.10 | -1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and BITQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -90.32% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -44.99% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -51.22% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -90.32% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | -27.36% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -51.97% | +28.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 22.43% | -3.05% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 9.38%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 19.86%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 19.86% | -10.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 44.31% | -18.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.40% | 59.03% | -25.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.79% | 67.26% | -23.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 67.15% | -29.31% |
ARKW vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and BITQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITQ has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to ARKW (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs BITQ's -90.32%.
On 5-year performance, BITQ leads with 0.93% vs -0.92% for ARKW. On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BITQ has performed better with a 0.93% return vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BITQ is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.85% for BITQ.
BITQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and BITQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer