ARKQ vs. PBOT
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Robotics funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 29.93% return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 20.63%
PBOT
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 24.79%
- YTD
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 8.14% | -4.93% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 29.93% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and PBOT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -15.78% | -44.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.79% | -3.50% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -4.28% | -12.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.36% | 26.92% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.72% | 26.92% | +5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 26.92% | +3.11% |
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than PBOT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and PBOT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
ARKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.07% for PBOT.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer