PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. PBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 24.27% return.


ARKQ

1D
0.96%
1M
-10.06%
6M
-7.14%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
19.53%
ALL TIME*
16.64%

PBOT

1D
1.33%
1M
-3.03%
6M
22.08%
YTD
24.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.90M$14.85M$24.73M
$18.25K$25.15K$21.82K

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.36%-4.93%
PBOT
Pictet AI & Automation ETF
24.27%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and PBOT is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PBOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKQPBOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and PBOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQPBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-15.78%

-44.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.99%

-7.70%

-12.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-4.51%

-12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.86%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQPBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.68%

26.96%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.85%

26.96%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.13%

26.96%

+3.17%

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than PBOT's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.27%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
PBOT
Pictet AI & Automation ETF
0.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and PBOT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

ARKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.08% for PBOT.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while PBOT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.70% for PBOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and PBOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer