ARKQ vs. NATO.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while NATO.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while NATO.L is passively managed. Over the past year, ARKQ returned 55.23% vs 17.19% for NATO.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NATO.L.

Performance

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than NATO.L's 10.38% return.

ARKQ

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 12.86%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 55.23%
• 3Y*: 32.57%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 21.73%

NATO.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	12.86%	48.81%	33.88%	2.38%
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	10.38%	54.83%	31.99%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and NATO.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.47

The correlation between ARKQ and NATO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

NATO.L

NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKQ	NATO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.85	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.31	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.15	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.34	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	3.23	+4.72

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the NATO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and NATO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than NATO.L's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and NATO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKQ	NATO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.89%	-12.87%	-47.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.58%	-12.79%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.02%	-4.45%	-5.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	-2.59%	-14.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.97%	5.31%	+1.66%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 12.70% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) at 7.02%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKQ	NATO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.70%	7.02%	+5.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.15%	16.02%	+10.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.54%	20.17%	+13.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.50%	19.14%	+13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	19.14%	+10.84%

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKQ vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while NATO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKQ and NATO.L in my portfolio?

ARKQ and NATO.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARKQ or NATO.L?

On fees, NATO.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKQ or NATO.L?

NATO.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between ARKQ and NATO.L?

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while NATO.L is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: ARK and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.49% for NATO.L.