ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS).
ARKQ and ICHN.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. ICHN.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019.
Performance
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | -0.13% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 16.54% |
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | -6.56% | 31.69% | 18.56% | -11.72% | -22.52% | -22.05% | 29.63% | 10.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than ICHN.AS's -6.56% return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 72.46%
- 3Y*
- 31.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.55%
ICHN.AS
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -13.57%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- -5.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ICHN.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
ICHN.AS
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKQ | ICHN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 0.23 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 0.46 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.06 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 0.90 | +2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 2.50 | +8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKQ | ICHN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.23 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.18 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.06 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and ICHN.AS is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ICHN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ICHN.AS drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and ICHN.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | ICHN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -62.67% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -16.87% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -56.59% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.58% | -34.83% | +20.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.43% | -33.80% | +16.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 6.08% | +0.52% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. ICHN.AS - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) at 6.89%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICHN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | ICHN.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 6.89% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.90% | 14.21% | +11.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.50% | 22.30% | +14.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 28.91% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 28.88% | +0.75% |