ARKK vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. ARKK is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKK returned 15.57%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for QCLN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

ARKK vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKK achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKK has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 15.57%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.

ARKK

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -3.01%
• YTD: -1.65%
• 6M: -5.90%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: -7.96%
• 10Y*: 15.57%

QCLN

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 37.91%
• 6M: 35.67%
• 1Y: 90.42%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: -0.62%
• 10Y*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKK vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF	-1.65%	35.49%	8.40%	69.04%	-66.97%	-23.60%	152.71%	35.08%	3.52%	87.33%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	37.91%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKK and QCLN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014	0.73

The correlation between ARKK and QCLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKK vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKK	QCLN
Healthcare	28.1%	-
Technology	25.9%	47.6%
Financial Services	16.2%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	10.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	-
Industrials	5.7%	24.8%
Basic Materials	-	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	8.1%

Return for Risk

ARKK vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKK

ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 20
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 83
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKK vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKK	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.46	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	2.89	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.37	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	5.51	-4.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	18.21	-16.68

ARKK vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKK Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKK and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKK vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKK drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKK and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKK	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.97%	-76.18%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.35%	-16.40%	-14.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.56%	-56.08%	+16.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.23%	-69.49%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.97%	-71.73%	-9.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.01%	-28.75%	-22.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.16%	-43.42%	+13.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.39%	4.95%	+9.44%

Volatility

ARKK vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is 11.81%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that ARKK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKK	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.81%	16.96%	-5.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.30%	28.95%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.28%	36.71%	-0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.40%	38.33%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.34%	35.10%	+5.24%

ARKK vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKK vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.70%	0.00%	0.55%	1.64%	0.38%	3.14%	1.32%	0.00%	2.27%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.16%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKK and QCLN in my portfolio?

ARKK and QCLN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKK or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to ARKK (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKK dropped -80.97% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, ARKK or QCLN?

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 16.43% vs 15.57% for ARKK. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ARKK has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKK or QCLN?

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 16.43% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKK or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKK or QCLN?

QCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.

What is the main difference between ARKK and QCLN?

ARKK is categorized as Technology Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKK and 0.60% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.