ARKK vs. IWM
ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. ARKK is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKK returned 15.57%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for IWM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
ARKK vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKK achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKK has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 15.57%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.
ARKK
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -5.90%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- -7.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 39.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
ARKK vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -1.65% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 35.08% | 3.52% | 87.33% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.22% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKK and IWM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ARKK and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKK vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKK
IWM
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
ARKK
IWM
Technology
ARKK
IWM
Financial Services
ARKK
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
ARKK
IWM
Communication Services
ARKK
IWM
Industrials
ARKK
IWM
Basic Materials
ARKK
-
IWM
Consumer Defensive
ARKK
-
IWM
Energy
ARKK
-
IWM
Real Estate
ARKK
-
IWM
Utilities
ARKK
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKK vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
ARKK
IWM
ARKK vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKK | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.57 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 12.63 | -11.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKK vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKK drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKK and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKK | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.97% | -59.05% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.35% | -11.03% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.56% | -27.50% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.23% | -31.91% | -45.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.97% | -41.13% | -39.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.01% | 0.00% | -51.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -10.76% | -19.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.39% | 3.12% | +11.27% |
Volatility
ARKK vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.16%. This indicates that ARKK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKK | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 7.16% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.30% | 14.29% | +12.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.28% | 19.73% | +16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.40% | 22.61% | +23.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 23.08% | +17.26% |
ARKK vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKK vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKK and IWM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to IWM (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKK dropped -80.97% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, ARKK leads with 15.57% vs 11.27% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKK has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
ARKK is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKK and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKK and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer