ARKG vs. PPH
Compare and contrast key facts about ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH).
ARKG and PPH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARKG is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Oct 31, 2014. PPH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
ARKG vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARKG vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | -6.49% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 180.40% | 44.00% | -1.26% | 46.61% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.25% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKG achieves a -6.49% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKG has underperformed PPH with an annualized return of 4.95%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.
ARKG
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 6M
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- -3.42%
- 5Y*
- -21.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.95%
PPH
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ARKG vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ARKG vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
ARKG
PPH
ARKG vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKG | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.06 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.55 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.81 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 4.66 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKG | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.06 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | 0.74 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.49 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.31 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKG and PPH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ARKG vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.06% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
ARKG vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKG drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than PPH's maximum drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKG and PPH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKG | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | -51.45% | -32.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.51% | -10.02% | -17.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.18% | -20.26% | -59.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.59% | -29.70% | -53.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.76% | -5.56% | -70.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -17.38% | -17.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 3.88% | +6.36% |
Volatility
ARKG vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 5.24%. This indicates that ARKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARKG | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 5.24% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.90% | 12.00% | +19.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.84% | 19.72% | +25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.39% | 14.87% | +30.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.94% | 16.95% | +23.99% |