ARKF vs. CBTJ
ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARKF returned -4.73% vs -30.36% for CBTJ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTJ.
Performance
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ARKF having a -16.17% return and CBTJ slightly lower at -16.58%.
ARKF
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- YTD
- -16.17%
- 6M
- -20.39%
- 1Y
- -4.73%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- -4.19%
- 10Y*
- —
CBTJ
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -16.58%
- 6M
- -22.65%
- 1Y
- -30.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -16.17% | 13.94% |
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -16.58% | -11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKF and CBTJ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ARKF and CBTJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKF vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank
ARKF
CBTJ
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKF | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.82 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.78 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -1.29 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKF | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | -1.12 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.80 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKF drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, which is greater than CBTJ's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKF and CBTJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKF | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.63% | -39.12% | -39.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.50% | -39.12% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.16% | -39.12% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -15.13% | -19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.22% | 23.62% | -3.40% |
Volatility
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) at 4.87%. This indicates that ARKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKF | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 4.87% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.47% | 19.34% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 27.13% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.79% | 25.64% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 25.64% | +14.13% |
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKF vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison
ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CBTJ's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 1.74% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKF and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKF has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to CBTJ (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKF dropped -78.63% vs CBTJ's -39.12%.
On 1-year performance, ARKF leads with -4.73% vs -30.36% for CBTJ. On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKF has performed better with a -4.73% return vs -30.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.
CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKF and 0.69% for CBTJ.
ARKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKF and CBTJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer