ARKD vs. IBLC
ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKD is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARKD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
ARKD vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKD
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 31.00%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 64.83%
- 3Y*
- 50.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | -0.32% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 21.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKD and IBLC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKD vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
ARKD
IBLC
ARKD vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKD | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.39 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
ARKD vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKD | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -62.54% | +48.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -13.87% | +11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -25.88% | +19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.58% | — |
Volatility
ARKD vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKD | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 54.80% | -34.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 64.46% | -44.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 64.46% | -44.56% |
ARKD vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKD vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.82% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKD and IBLC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for ARKD and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer