ARKD vs. BCDF
ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
ARKD vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKD
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | -0.32% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKD and BCDF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKD vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
ARKD
BCDF
ARKD vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKD | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.39 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
ARKD vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKD | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -27.70% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -7.53% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -9.83% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
ARKD vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKD | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 14.75% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 16.94% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 16.94% | +2.96% |
ARKD vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKD vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.44% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKD and BCDF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for ARKD and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer