ARKB vs. WGMI
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ) and WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKB is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -38.64% vs 294.61% for WGMI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.
Performance
ARKB vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 84.78% return.
ARKB
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 40.03%
- YTD
- 84.78%
- 6M
- 55.52%
- 1Y
- 294.61%
- 3Y*
- 86.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -25.34% | -6.59% | 99.47% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 84.78% | 72.47% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and WGMI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ARKB and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
WGMI
ARKB vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.42 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 5.83 | -6.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 11.81 | -13.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 3.91 | -4.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.31 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and WGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -85.76% | +36.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.30% | -50.94% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.01% | -1.11% | -46.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -42.90% | +26.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.40% | 25.08% | +3.32% |
Volatility
ARKB vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) is 9.44%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 20.10%. This indicates that ARKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 20.10% | -10.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.31% | 55.64% | -21.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.54% | 76.03% | -32.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 81.53% | -31.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 81.53% | -31.59% |
ARKB vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKB vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKB nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKB and WGMI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGMI has higher volatility (20.10%) compared to ARKB (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -49.30% vs WGMI's -85.76%.
On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 294.61% vs -38.64% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 9.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 294.61% return vs -38.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
ARKB and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.75% for WGMI.
WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and WGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer