ARKB vs. IBLC
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ARKB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -43.47% vs 46.13% for IBLC. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
ARKB vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -31.61% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 21.51% return.
ARKB
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -20.99%
- YTD
- -31.61%
- 6M
- -31.45%
- 1Y
- -43.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 46.13%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -31.61% | -6.59% | 86.54% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 21.51% | 27.05% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and IBLC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ARKB and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
IBLC
ARKB vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.17 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.03 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 2.02 | -3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.37% | -62.54% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.37% | -44.94% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.37% | -20.11% | -32.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -25.75% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.72% | 22.92% | +7.80% |
Volatility
ARKB vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) is 13.35%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 17.25%. This indicates that ARKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 17.25% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.46% | 41.51% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 56.05% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 64.52% | -14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 64.52% | -14.45% |
ARKB vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKB vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.15% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKB and IBLC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (17.25%) compared to ARKB (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -52.37% vs IBLC's -62.54%.
On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 46.13% vs -43.47% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 46.13% return vs -43.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.
ARKB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer