ARKB vs. CBOO
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF ) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ARKB is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
ARKB vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.04% return.
ARKB
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -25.34% | -28.14% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKB and CBOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKB vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
ARKB
CBOO
ARKB vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKB | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKB | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -1.19 | +1.49 |
Drawdowns
ARKB vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKB | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -2.34% | -46.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.01% | -1.72% | -46.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -1.61% | -14.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.40% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKB vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKB | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.54% | 2.14% | +41.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 2.14% | +47.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 2.14% | +47.80% |
ARKB vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKB vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKB and CBOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.
ARKB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for ARKB and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer