ARKB vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKB is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -43.47% vs 80.09% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.

Performance

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -31.61% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 52.26% return.

ARKB

• 1D: -3.97%
• 1M: -20.99%
• YTD: -31.61%
• 6M: -31.45%
• 1Y: -43.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 8.09%
• 1M: 51.90%
• YTD: 52.26%
• 6M: 51.36%
• 1Y: 80.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF	-31.61%	-6.59%	61.23%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	52.26%	-29.11%	-76.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKB and BTCZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024	-1.00

The correlation between ARKB and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARKB vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKB

ARKB Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ARKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKB	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	0.91	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	1.65	-3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.20	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.64	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	3.38	-4.79

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKB Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKB and BTCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKB	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.37%	-91.06%	+38.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.37%	-49.02%	-3.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.37%	-75.45%	+23.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-73.68%	+56.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.72%	23.81%	+6.91%

Volatility

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) is 13.35%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 27.02%. This indicates that ARKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKB	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.35%	27.02%	-13.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.46%	68.78%	-34.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.28%	89.06%	-44.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.07%	97.16%	-47.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.07%	97.16%	-47.09%

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKB vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKB and BTCZ in my portfolio?

ARKB and BTCZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKB or BTCZ?

BTCZ has higher volatility (27.02%) compared to ARKB (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -52.37% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.

Which ETF is better, ARKB or BTCZ?

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 80.09% vs -43.47% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKB or BTCZ?

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 80.09% return vs -43.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKB or BTCZ?

ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKB or BTCZ?

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.

What is the main difference between ARKB and BTCZ?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.