ARIS vs. PM
Compare and contrast key facts about Aris Water Solutions, Inc. (ARIS) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM).
Performance
ARIS vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARIS vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARIS Aris Water Solutions, Inc. | 3.92% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | -8.75% |
Fundamentals
ARIS:
$3.77B
PM:
$248.73B
ARIS:
$0.40
PM:
$7.47
ARIS:
46.08
PM:
22.14
ARIS:
0.91
PM:
2.10
ARIS:
3.90
PM:
6.27
ARIS:
$929.55M
PM:
$40.60B
ARIS:
$443.20M
PM:
$26.97B
ARIS:
$333.79M
PM:
$17.08B
Returns By Period
ARIS
- 1D
- 7.84%
- 1M
- -18.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PM
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -10.71%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARIS vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
ARIS
PM
ARIS vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aris Water Solutions, Inc. (ARIS) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARIS | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.52 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARIS and PM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ARIS vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
ARIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARIS Aris Water Solutions, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.48% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
ARIS vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARIS drawdown since its inception was -28.97%, smaller than the maximum PM drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARIS and PM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARIS | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.97% | -42.87% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -12.11% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.50% | -10.03% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.75% | — |
Volatility
ARIS vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARIS | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.55% | 25.83% | +41.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 21.80% | +45.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 24.02% | +43.53% |
Financials
ARIS vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aris Water Solutions, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARIS vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
ARIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aris Water Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 160.21M and revenue of 313.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.78B and revenue of 10.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.
ARIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aris Water Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 132.25M and revenue of 313.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.2%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.42B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
ARIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aris Water Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 51.64M and revenue of 313.31M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.