PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGFX vs. FVCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel Fund (ARGFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGFX achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 28.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARGFX having a 10.54% annualized return and FVCSX not far behind at 10.34%.


ARGFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.34%
6M
8.08%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.93%

FVCSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.97%
6M
18.57%
YTD
28.24%
1Y
42.56%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGFX
Ariel Fund
13.71%14.08%11.56%15.78%-18.68%30.29%10.05%24.64%-13.59%15.99%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
28.24%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGFX and FVCSX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.81

The correlation between ARGFX and FVCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGFX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARGFX
ARGFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ARGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Fund (ARGFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARGFXFVCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.93

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

15.12

-9.06

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGFX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGFX drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGFX and FVCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGFXFVCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.02%

-70.38%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-9.89%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.07%

-37.07%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.00%

-37.07%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.29%

-48.07%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.94%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-11.14%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

2.58%

+1.63%

Volatility

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

Ariel Fund (ARGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) at 3.27%. This indicates that ARGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGFXFVCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

3.27%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

11.74%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

17.02%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

20.97%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

22.13%

+0.57%

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARGFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARGFX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

ARGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than FVCSX's 10.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGFX
Ariel Fund
10.38%11.80%5.49%5.09%9.01%5.56%5.33%5.81%10.35%6.30%6.56%16.28%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.20%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGFX and FVCSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGFX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FVCSX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGFX dropped -71.02% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGFX and FVCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer