ARES vs. USFR
ARES (Ares Management Corporation) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, ARES returned 29.14%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ARES vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 29.14%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
ARES
- 1D
- -5.72%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- YTD
- -27.42%
- 6M
- -30.61%
- 1Y
- -29.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.51%
- 10Y*
- 29.14%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
ARES vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -27.42% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARES and USFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | -0.00 |
The correlation between ARES and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARES vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
ARES
USFR
ARES vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 13.31 | -12.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 201.33 | -201.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 779.76 | -780.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARES vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -1.36% | -48.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.05% | -0.02% | -49.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.73% | -0.06% | -49.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.73% | -0.18% | -49.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -0.80% | -48.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.88% | 0.00% | -38.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -0.15% | -11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.53% | 0.01% | +25.52% |
Volatility
ARES vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that ARES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.83% | 0.09% | +13.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.11% | 0.19% | +35.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.17% | 0.27% | +41.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.60% | 0.40% | +37.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.78% | 0.78% | +36.00% |
Dividends
ARES vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 5.82% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARES and USFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARES and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer