ARES vs. USFR
ARES (Ares Management Corporation) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, ARES returned 29.23%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for USFR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARES vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -22.80% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 29.23%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
ARES
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- -22.80%
- 6M
- -22.12%
- 1Y
- -24.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 29.23%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
ARES vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -22.80% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARES and USFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2014 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARES vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
ARES
USFR
ARES vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -51.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 13.43 | -12.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 203.42 | -203.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 787.84 | -788.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | 15.11 | -15.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 9.26 | -8.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 3.07 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.60 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
ARES vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -1.36% | -48.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.05% | -0.02% | -49.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.73% | -0.06% | -49.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.73% | -0.18% | -49.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -0.80% | -48.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.00% | 0.00% | -35.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -0.16% | -11.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.48% | 0.01% | +24.47% |
Volatility
ARES vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that ARES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARES | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | 0.06% | +9.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.82% | 0.18% | +34.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.54% | 0.27% | +40.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.22% | 0.40% | +36.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.63% | 0.81% | +35.82% |
Dividends
ARES vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 4.51% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARES and USFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARES and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer