ARES vs. REGB.L

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

ARES (Ares Management Corporation) is a stock, while REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Over the past 3 years, ARES returned 7.32%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for REGB.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ARES vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ARES is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -31.41% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 16.51% return.

ARES

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: -31.41%
• 6M: -34.42%
• 1Y: -34.85%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 14.87%
• 10Y*: 27.74%

REGB.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -15.17%
• YTD: 16.51%
• 6M: 15.03%
• 1Y: 111.11%
• 3Y*: 1.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARES vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARES Ares Management Corporation	-31.41%	-5.72%	52.68%	79.52%	-12.75%	5.27%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	16.51%	88.93%	-35.64%	-18.71%	-31.13%	-21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ARES and REGB.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	0.23

The correlation between ARES and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ARES vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARES

ARES Risk / Return Rank: 12
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 11

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARES vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARES	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	2.37	-3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.05	2.84	-3.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.34	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	5.08	-5.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	12.12	-13.46

ARES vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARES Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARES and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARES vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, smaller than the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and REGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARES	REGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.73%	-75.84%	+26.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.05%	-22.01%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.73%	-61.39%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.25%	-37.42%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.40%	-48.38%	+36.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.91%	9.20%	+16.71%

Volatility

ARES vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) have volatilities of 13.98% and 13.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARES	REGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.98%	13.82%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.10%	34.38%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.24%	47.30%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.59%	48.32%	-10.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.53%	48.32%	-11.79%

Dividends

ARES vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, while REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARES Ares Management Corporation	6.16%	3.29%	2.10%	2.59%	3.57%	2.31%	3.40%	3.59%	7.50%	5.65%	4.32%	6.81%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARES and REGB.L in my portfolio?

ARES and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.