ARES vs. DBC
ARES (Ares Management Corporation) is a stock, while DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) is Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Over the past 10 years, ARES returned 28.98%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for DBC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARES vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 28.98%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.52% annualized return.
ARES
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -23.79%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 1Y
- -26.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- 28.98%
DBC
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 31.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
ARES vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -20.05% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.28% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARES and DBC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ARES and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARES vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
ARES
DBC
ARES vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARES | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.29 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.94 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 6.62 | -7.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARES vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARES | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -76.36% | +26.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.05% | -16.54% | -32.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.73% | -16.54% | -33.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.73% | -27.34% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -41.71% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.68% | -26.37% | -6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -46.12% | +34.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.00% | 4.82% | +22.18% |
Volatility
ARES vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 6.03%. This indicates that ARES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARES | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 6.03% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.30% | 16.71% | +19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.74% | 18.85% | +23.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 19.29% | +18.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 17.80% | +18.74% |
Dividends
ARES vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 5.28% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARES and DBC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to DBC (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs DBC's -76.36%.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARES and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer