PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AREG.L vs. VPN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AREG.L is traded in GBp, while VPN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VPN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AREG.L achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than VPN.L's 32.81% return.


AREG.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.53%
6M
8.28%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
12.61%
3Y*
-3.46%
5Y*
10Y*

VPN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.83%
6M
20.60%
YTD
32.81%
1Y
48.67%
3Y*
26.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AREG.L
abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF
9.41%0.47%-21.52%5.44%
VPN.L
Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc
32.81%20.10%15.53%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AREG.L and VPN.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023

0.39

The correlation between AREG.L and VPN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AREG.L vs. VPN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AREG.L
AREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
AREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
AREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VPN.L
VPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AREG.LVPN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+93.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

52.77

1.34

+51.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.38

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

9.82

-9.29

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the VPN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AREG.L and VPN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AREG.L drawdown since its inception was -99.23%, which is greater than VPN.L's maximum drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AREG.L and VPN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AREG.LVPN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.23%

-26.92%

-72.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.00%

-14.51%

-84.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.23%

-26.71%

-72.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.36%

-14.51%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.92%

-11.30%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.12%

5.00%

+18.12%

Volatility

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) is 3.14%, while Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that AREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AREG.LVPN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

7.89%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

16.82%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9,884.40%

23.13%

+9,861.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,931.24%

21.36%

+6,909.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6,931.24%

21.36%

+6,909.88%

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AREG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than VPN.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AREG.L vs. VPN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AREG.L nor VPN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AREG.L and VPN.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AREG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AREG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.L.

They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AREG.L and 0.50% for VPN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AREG.L and VPN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer