PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARE vs. EXEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARE vs. EXEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) and Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARE achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than EXEL's 18.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE has underperformed EXEL with an annualized return of -3.11%, while EXEL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.50% annualized return.


ARE

1D
-1.99%
1M
8.65%
YTD
4.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
-24.01%
3Y*
-21.27%
5Y*
-20.01%
10Y*
-3.11%

EXEL

1D
-1.82%
1M
7.43%
YTD
18.05%
6M
22.69%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
39.16%
5Y*
17.83%
10Y*
21.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARE vs. EXEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
4.32%-46.60%-19.44%-9.11%-32.62%28.09%13.27%44.04%-8.97%20.95%
EXEL
Exelixis, Inc.
18.05%31.62%38.81%49.56%-12.25%-8.92%13.90%-10.42%-35.30%103.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ARE and EXEL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2000

0.27

Fundamentals

EPS

ARE:

-$8.32

EXEL:

$3.00

PS Ratio

ARE:

2.21

EXEL:

6.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARE:

$2.90B

EXEL:

$2.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARE:

$1.98B

EXEL:

$1.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARE:

$646.49M

EXEL:

$991.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARE vs. EXEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARE
ARE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

EXEL
EXEL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EXEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXEL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EXEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARE vs. EXEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) and Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AREEXELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.13

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

0.81

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

1.94

-2.69

ARE vs. EXEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARE Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the EXEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARE and EXEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AREEXELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

0.50

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.61

0.48

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.49

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.08

+0.15

Drawdowns

ARE vs. EXEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARE drawdown since its inception was -77.92%, smaller than the maximum EXEL drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE and EXEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AREEXELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.92%

-97.38%

+19.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.61%

-25.16%

-26.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.64%

-25.34%

-40.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.92%

-36.12%

-41.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-57.20%

-20.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.54%

-1.82%

-70.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.72%

-71.08%

+53.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.18%

10.44%

+21.74%

Volatility

ARE vs. EXEL - Volatility Comparison

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) at 11.21%. This indicates that ARE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AREEXELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.28%

11.21%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.89%

25.96%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.89%

40.34%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.00%

37.17%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.18%

44.47%

-15.29%

Dividends

ARE vs. EXEL - Dividend Comparison

ARE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, while EXEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
8.12%9.56%5.32%3.91%3.24%2.01%2.38%2.48%3.24%2.64%2.91%3.38%
EXEL
Exelixis, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARE vs. EXEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and Exelixis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
671.02M
610.81M
(ARE) Total Revenue
(EXEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARE vs. EXEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and Exelixis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
66.6%
0
Portfolio components
ARE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. reported a gross profit of 446.88M and revenue of 671.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

EXEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exelixis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 610.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. reported an operating income of 412.20M and revenue of 671.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.4%.

EXEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exelixis, Inc. reported an operating income of 251.34M and revenue of 610.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.

ARE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. reported a net income of 358.87M and revenue of 671.02M, resulting in a net margin of 53.5%.

EXEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exelixis, Inc. reported a net income of 210.47M and revenue of 610.81M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARE and EXEL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARE has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to EXEL (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARE dropped -77.92% vs EXEL's -97.38%.

EXEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARE and EXEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer