ARDC vs. CII

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ARDC (Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.) is a stock, while CII (BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, ARDC returned 8.49%/yr vs 15.24%/yr for CII. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ARDC vs. CII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARDC achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than CII's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ARDC has underperformed CII with an annualized return of 8.49%, while CII has yielded a comparatively higher 15.24% annualized return.

ARDC

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.49%
• 6M: -0.63%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 1Y: -0.99%
• 3Y*: 11.86%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: 8.49%

CII

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 5.65%
• 6M: 12.55%
• YTD: 13.80%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 14.35%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARDC vs. CII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	1.39%	-3.10%	21.05%	32.35%	-22.21%	23.12%	2.56%	21.26%	-8.80%	17.63%
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund	13.80%	37.78%	12.70%	18.47%	-13.21%	34.26%	8.11%	30.46%	-8.60%	27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ARDC and CII is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012	0.38

Return for Risk

ARDC vs. CII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARDC

ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 38
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CII

CII Risk / Return Rank: 88
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARDC vs. CII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARDC	CII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	2.58	-2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	3.41	-3.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.44	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	3.60	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	13.06	-13.18

ARDC vs. CII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the CII Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARDC and CII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARDC vs. CII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARDC drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, smaller than the maximum CII drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARDC and CII.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARDC	CII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.40%	-56.43%	+11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.57%	-11.67%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.78%	-21.05%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.48%	-22.32%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.40%	-40.56%	-4.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.33%	-1.91%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-6.16%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	3.21%	+4.57%

Volatility

ARDC vs. CII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) is 2.32%, while BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that ARDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARDC	CII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	5.92%	-3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.35%	12.89%	-5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.63%	16.29%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.79%	17.31%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	18.61%	-1.75%

ARDC vs. CII - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARDC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CII's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARDC vs. CII - Dividend Comparison

ARDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%, less than CII's 15.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.	10.56%	10.19%	9.33%	9.85%	10.31%	7.16%	8.40%	8.40%	9.35%	7.58%	8.45%	10.51%
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund	15.17%	16.65%	6.15%	6.28%	12.27%	4.98%	6.03%	5.79%	7.06%	6.07%	8.38%	8.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARDC and CII in my portfolio?

ARDC and CII have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARDC or CII?

CII has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to ARDC (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARDC dropped -45.40% vs CII's -56.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.