ARCX vs. TSMG
ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARCX returned -85.69% vs 241.80% for TSMG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
ARCX vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCX achieves a -62.89% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 80.39% return.
ARCX
- 1D
- -6.89%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -62.89%
- 6M
- -69.07%
- 1Y
- -85.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- -13.49%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 80.39%
- 6M
- 88.25%
- 1Y
- 241.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -62.89% | -71.53% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 80.39% | 94.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCX and TSMG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCX vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
ARCX
TSMG
ARCX vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.39 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 6.90 | -7.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 22.04 | -23.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCX vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCX drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCX and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -63.67% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.99% | -35.29% | -56.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.56% | -13.49% | -78.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -16.65% | -48.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.76% | 11.03% | +58.73% |
Volatility
ARCX vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a higher volatility of 46.44% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) at 33.00%. This indicates that ARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.44% | 33.00% | +13.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.89% | 60.76% | +29.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.27% | 76.78% | +61.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 83.21% | +57.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.75% | 83.21% | +57.54% |
ARCX vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCX vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
ARCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 6.37% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCX and TSMG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCX has higher volatility (46.44%) compared to TSMG (33.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCX dropped -91.99% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 241.80% vs -85.69% for ARCX. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMG has been the lower-risk option at 33.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 241.80% return vs -85.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for ARCX.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARCX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for ARCX and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCX and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer