PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCNX vs. BICSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than BICSX's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCNX has outperformed BICSX with an annualized return of 10.50%, while BICSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.


ARCNX

1D
-2.20%
1M
-10.69%
YTD
8.08%
6M
6.71%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
10.50%

BICSX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-8.79%
YTD
9.28%
6M
7.82%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
8.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
8.08%20.76%7.19%-0.50%20.97%39.48%8.11%17.68%-17.83%10.20%
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
9.28%28.70%4.38%-4.32%11.90%22.44%6.80%11.60%-14.50%8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCNX and BICSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.77

The correlation between ARCNX and BICSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCNX vs. BICSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCNX
ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BICSX
BICSX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCNXBICSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.26

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

10.95

-3.36

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the BICSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCNX and BICSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, which is greater than BICSX's maximum drawdown of -51.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and BICSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCNXBICSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.17%

-51.59%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.52%

-11.71%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-11.71%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-22.35%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-35.82%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.52%

-11.71%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-20.46%

-5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.41%

+0.74%

Volatility

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) at 4.20%. This indicates that ARCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCNXBICSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.20%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

12.41%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

15.10%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

15.82%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

15.04%

+2.40%

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BICSX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARCNX vs. BICSX - Dividend Comparison

ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, more than BICSX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
12.56%13.57%1.89%7.45%9.45%18.31%0.09%4.98%0.29%0.01%4.69%
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
2.83%3.09%3.60%9.39%9.05%2.68%0.80%2.03%2.12%0.65%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCNX and BICSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARCNX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to BICSX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCNX dropped -55.17% vs BICSX's -51.59%.

BICSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCNX and BICSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer