ARCM vs. MINT
ARCM (Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARCM returned 3.16%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for MINT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.
Performance
ARCM vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCM achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.
ARCM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
ARCM vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCM Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF | 1.36% | 4.11% | 5.24% | 4.72% | 0.69% | -0.26% | 0.95% | 2.70% | 1.33% | 0.82% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCM and MINT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCM vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
ARCM
MINT
ARCM vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARCM | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -47.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.50 | 20.53 | -16.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.94 | 94.30 | -64.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 243.82 | 939.26 | -695.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCM | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44 | 17.09 | -8.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 5.99 | -4.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 2.47 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
ARCM vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCM drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCM and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCM | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -4.62% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.05% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.46% | -0.16% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.46% | -2.42% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.17% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.00% | +0.02% |
Volatility
ARCM vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) has a higher volatility of 0.10% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that ARCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCM | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.09% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 0.20% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44% | 0.27% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 0.58% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 0.95% | +2.18% |
ARCM vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCM vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
ARCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCM Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF | 3.73% | 4.13% | 4.87% | 4.26% | 0.90% | 0.02% | 0.84% | 2.32% | 1.91% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCM and MINT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCM has higher volatility (0.10%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCM dropped -4.08% vs MINT's -4.62%.
On 5-year performance, MINT leads with 3.47% vs 3.16% for ARCM. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MINT has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 3.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ARCM.
MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.73% for ARCM.
They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ARCM and 0.36% for MINT.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 8.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCM and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer