ARCB vs. MSFT
ARCB (ArcBest Corporation) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. ARCB operates in Trucking (Industrials), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ARCB returned 27.50%/yr vs 24.39%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARCB vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCB achieves a 133.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCB has outperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 27.50%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively lower 24.39% annualized return.
ARCB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 45.53%
- YTD
- 133.73%
- 6M
- 126.46%
- 1Y
- 155.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 27.50%
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
ARCB vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCB ArcBest Corporation | 133.73% | -19.96% | -22.05% | 72.43% | -41.25% | 182.09% | 56.54% | -18.60% | -3.44% | 30.95% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCB and MSFT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 1992 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARCB and MSFT has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ARCB:
$3.87B
MSFT:
$2.91T
ARCB:
$2.46
MSFT:
$16.79
ARCB:
70.40
MSFT:
23.27
ARCB:
0.97
MSFT:
9.16
ARCB:
3.00
MSFT:
7.02
ARCB:
$4.04B
MSFT:
$318.27B
ARCB:
$165.40M
MSFT:
$217.41B
ARCB:
$221.85M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCB vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
ARCB
MSFT
ARCB vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCB | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.89 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.89 | -0.53 | +5.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | -1.08 | +12.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCB vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCB drawdown since its inception was -85.88%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCB and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCB | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.88% | -69.38% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.60% | -33.91% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.45% | -33.91% | -28.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.45% | -37.15% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.85% | -37.15% | -30.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -27.46% | +27.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -21.78% | -11.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.02% | 16.48% | -3.46% |
Volatility
ARCB vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) has a higher volatility of 14.02% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.52%. This indicates that ARCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCB | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.02% | 10.52% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.83% | 22.31% | +12.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.55% | 25.42% | +23.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.75% | 26.66% | +23.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 27.06% | +22.72% |
Dividends
ARCB vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
ARCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCB ArcBest Corporation | 0.28% | 0.65% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.63% | 0.27% | 0.75% | 1.16% | 0.93% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.22% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
ARCB vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcBest Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARCB vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
ARCB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcBest Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.43M and revenue of 998.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
ARCB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcBest Corporation reported an operating income of 3.43M and revenue of 998.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
ARCB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcBest Corporation reported a net income of -1.04M and revenue of 998.79M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCB and MSFT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCB has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCB dropped -85.88% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
ARCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCB and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer