PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCB vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARCB vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCB achieves a 91.98% return, which is significantly higher than INSW's 65.57% return.


ARCB

1D
0.20%
1M
22.94%
YTD
91.98%
6M
107.56%
1Y
122.21%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
24.49%

INSW

1D
-0.71%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
65.57%
6M
56.10%
1Y
127.10%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCB vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCB
ArcBest Corporation
91.98%-19.96%-22.05%72.43%-41.25%182.09%56.54%-18.60%-3.44%30.95%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
65.57%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCB and INSW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARCB:

$3.17B

INSW:

$3.88B

EPS

ARCB:

$2.46

INSW:

$11.01

PE Ratio

ARCB:

57.83

INSW:

7.08

PS Ratio

ARCB:

0.80

INSW:

5.72

PB Ratio

ARCB:

2.47

INSW:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARCB:

$4.04B

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARCB:

$165.40M

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARCB:

$221.85M

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCB vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCB
ARCB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ARCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCB vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARCBINSWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

3.49

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

4.22

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.48

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

7.91

-3.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.42

23.47

-14.05

ARCB vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCB and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARCBINSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.49

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

1.10

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.61

-0.45

Drawdowns

ARCB vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCB drawdown since its inception was -85.88%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCB and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCBINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.88%

-57.49%

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.60%

-16.16%

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.45%

-50.40%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.45%

-50.40%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-14.90%

+9.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-20.91%

-12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.02%

5.44%

+7.58%

Volatility

ARCB vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) at 11.74%. This indicates that ARCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCBINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.56%

11.74%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

27.72%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.77%

36.61%

+11.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.93%

41.01%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.66%

45.21%

+4.45%

Dividends

ARCB vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

ARCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than INSW's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCB
ArcBest Corporation
0.34%0.65%0.51%0.40%0.63%0.27%0.75%1.16%0.93%0.90%1.16%1.22%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
5.62%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARCB vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcBest Corporation and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
998.79M
15.96M
(ARCB) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCB and INSW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARCB has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to INSW (11.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCB dropped -85.88% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCB and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer