PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARBNX vs. ACFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX) and Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARBNX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than ACFIX's 1.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARBNX having a 3.52% annualized return and ACFIX not far ahead at 3.68%.


ARBNX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
1.49%
YTD
1.71%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
3.52%
ALL TIME*
3.26%

ACFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.51%
6M
1.43%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
3.68%
ALL TIME*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARBNX
The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional
1.71%8.29%2.95%6.05%-0.67%1.05%5.71%3.84%2.33%2.87%
ACFIX
Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund
1.91%4.79%5.51%6.54%-2.70%3.24%6.71%5.68%1.85%1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ARBNX and ACFIX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2012

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARBNX vs. ACFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARBNX
ARBNX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ARBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ARBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFIX
ACFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ACFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX) and Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARBNXACFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.37

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

0.20

+5.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.11

0.22

+23.89

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARBNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the ACFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARBNX and ACFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARBNX drawdown since its inception was -14.42%, smaller than the maximum ACFIX drawdown of -20.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARBNX and ACFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARBNXACFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.42%

-20.82%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.92%

-20.82%

+19.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.24%

-20.82%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-20.82%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.90%

-20.82%

+8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-17.80%

+17.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-1.87%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

18.47%

-18.27%

Volatility

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Volatility Comparison

The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) at 0.32%. This indicates that ARBNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARBNXACFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.32%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

1.14%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

33.49%

-31.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

15.13%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

10.89%

-6.47%

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARBNX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ACFIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARBNX vs. ACFIX - Dividend Comparison

ARBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than ACFIX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFIX
Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund
3.54%4.17%4.71%4.00%3.55%2.59%2.95%3.52%2.92%3.01%2.38%2.91%
ARBNX
The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional
3.66%3.72%1.18%2.11%3.85%0.51%6.70%2.12%1.93%3.80%0.93%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARBNX and ACFIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARBNX has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to ACFIX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARBNX dropped -14.42% vs ACFIX's -20.82%.

ARBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARBNX and ACFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer