ACFIX vs. SCFZX
ACFIX (Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund) and SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ACFIX returned 3.52%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for SCFZX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACFIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SCFZX.
Performance
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACFIX having a 2.25% return and SCFZX slightly higher at 2.28%.
ACFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFIX Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund | 2.25% | 4.79% | 5.51% | 6.54% | -2.70% | 3.24% | 6.71% | 2.05% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.28% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 5.27% | -0.33% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACFIX and SCFZX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACFIX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank
ACFIX
SCFZX
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACFIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 4.09 | -3.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 17.53 | -17.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 6.28 | -4.86 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 20.02 | -19.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 69.95 | -69.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACFIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 4.09 | -3.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 2.78 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.37 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, which is greater than SCFZX's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFIX and SCFZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACFIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -17.20% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.82% | -0.31% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.82% | -0.93% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.82% | -4.13% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.53% | 0.00% | -17.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -1.06% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.05% | 0.09% | +16.96% |
Volatility
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison
Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) have volatilities of 0.43% and 0.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACFIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.42% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 1.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.55% | 1.50% | +32.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 1.91% | +13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 3.35% | +7.54% |
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACFIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACFIX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison
ACFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than SCFZX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFIX Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 4.00% | 3.55% | 2.59% | 2.95% | 3.52% | 2.92% | 3.01% | 2.38% | 2.91% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 5.08% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACFIX and SCFZX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACFIX has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to SCFZX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFIX dropped -20.82% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACFIX and SCFZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer