PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ARAW.DE is traded in EUR, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARAW.DE achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -8.65% return.


ARAW.DE

1D
-2.07%
1M
2.74%
YTD
26.31%
6M
36.73%
1Y
137.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLI.L

1D
-3.69%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
-8.65%
6M
-7.84%
1Y
44.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARAW.DE
abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF
26.31%94.76%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-8.65%54.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ARAW.DE and TSLI.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARAW.DE
ARAW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ARAW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARAW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARAW.DETSLI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.21

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

1.81

+4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.81

4.60

+21.20

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARAW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.36, which is higher than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARAW.DE and TSLI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARAW.DETSLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36

1.18

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.33

0.59

+3.73

Drawdowns

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum TSLI.L drawdown of -44.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAW.DE and TSLI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARAW.DETSLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-44.23%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.41%

-24.39%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-14.26%

+9.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-14.19%

+11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

9.60%

-4.30%

Volatility

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) is 11.01%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that ARAW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARAW.DETSLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.01%

12.04%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.93%

25.60%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.38%

37.83%

-6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.66%

43.78%

-13.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.66%

43.78%

-13.12%

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARAW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

ARAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%.


PositionTTM20252024
ARAW.DE
abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
74.25%73.68%19.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARAW.DE and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARAW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSLI.L.

ARAW.DE is categorized as Materials, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ARAW.DE and 0.55% for TSLI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARAW.DE and TSLI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer