ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L
ARAW.DE (abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF) and TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - ARAW.DE is a Materials fund actively managed by abrdn, while TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARAW.DE returned 137.40% vs 44.44% for TSLI.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARAW.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSLI.L.
Performance
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARAW.DE is traded in EUR, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARAW.DE achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -8.65% return.
ARAW.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 137.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLI.L
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- 44.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 26.31% | 94.76% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -8.65% | 54.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARAW.DE and TSLI.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARAW.DE
TSLI.L
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARAW.DE | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.21 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 1.81 | +4.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.81 | 4.60 | +21.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARAW.DE | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36 | 1.18 | +3.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.33 | 0.59 | +3.73 |
Drawdowns
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum TSLI.L drawdown of -44.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAW.DE and TSLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARAW.DE | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -44.23% | +23.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.41% | -24.39% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -14.26% | +9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -14.19% | +11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 9.60% | -4.30% |
Volatility
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) is 11.01%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that ARAW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARAW.DE | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 12.04% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.93% | 25.60% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.38% | 37.83% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 43.78% | -13.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 43.78% | -13.12% |
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARAW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARAW.DE vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison
ARAW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 74.25% | 73.68% | 19.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARAW.DE and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARAW.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSLI.L.
ARAW.DE is categorized as Materials, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ARAW.DE and 0.55% for TSLI.L.
Find the right allocation for ARAW.DE and TSLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer