ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE
ARAW.DE (abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF) and IQSA.DE (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ARAW.DE is a Materials fund actively managed by abrdn, while IQSA.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARAW.DE returned 137.40% vs 28.62% for IQSA.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARAW.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQSA.DE.
Performance
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARAW.DE achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than IQSA.DE's 14.81% return.
ARAW.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 137.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQSA.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 26.31% | 94.76% |
IQSA.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.81% | 11.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARAW.DE and IQSA.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ARAW.DE
IQSA.DE
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARAW.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.43 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 4.60 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.81 | 18.23 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARAW.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36 | 2.34 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.33 | 0.94 | +3.38 |
Drawdowns
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum IQSA.DE drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARAW.DE and IQSA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARAW.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -34.11% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.41% | -6.20% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -0.33% | -4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -4.38% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 1.57% | +3.73% |
Volatility
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE) at 3.32%. This indicates that ARAW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQSA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARAW.DE | IQSA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 3.32% | +7.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.93% | 8.85% | +17.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.38% | 12.17% | +19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 14.71% | +15.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 16.74% | +13.92% |
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARAW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARAW.DE vs. IQSA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARAW.DE nor IQSA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARAW.DE and IQSA.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ARAW.DE.
ARAW.DE is categorized as Materials, while IQSA.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ARAW.DE and 0.30% for IQSA.DE.
Find the right allocation for ARAW.DE and IQSA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer